This past winter, I finally got around
to reading the book, “1776” by David McCullough.
It’s a book that focuses on that very important year when our colonies
were fighting for independence from Britain.
This book reminded me of just how divided we were in our cause for
freedom. Sure, there were many who were
tired and angry over British rule, but there were also many people who remained
loyal to the British cause. Even beyond this major division, there was a lot
diversity among the different colonies.
Each colony had its own identity, its own history, and its own needs and
perspectives. It was quite a challenge for our founding fathers to bring us
together as one united people.
When it was time for our new nation to select a permanent location for
our capitol, they didn’t choose Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, or New York.
Choosing any one of those cities would have been showing favoritism to one
colony or region. So they ended up
creating a new city that would be a symbol of our new nation. Washington D.C. became the wise political
solution for promoting unity among so much diversity.
Like our country’s founders, the leaders of Israel faced the same
challenge in trying to unify a people of so many diversities and backgrounds. In our summer focus on the life of David,
today’s scripture from II Samuel is the story of David becoming King of both
the southern and the northern tribes of Israel.
David had been serving as king of the southern part of Israel but the
northern part was being ruled by a different king. And these two regions of Israel were at
constant war with each other. This was
not the unified Israel that God had intended for his people.
And this was the Prophet Samuel’s greatest fear when the people of
Israel had first approached him about wanting to be like the other nations and
have their own king. This is one of
those, “I told you so” moments. Thankfully, there are a couple of heroes in our
passage of scripture today who were brave enough to step out in faith for the
sake of bringing unity to a divided nation.
The first hero was actually some of the leaders who belonged to the
northern tribes of Israel. They were
somehow able to put aside their animosity with the southern tribes and make the
journey into their territory to meet with David.
This was a very risky political move on the part of these northern
leaders. Their political approval
ratings probably took a nose dive when this trip was first announced. But they were more concerned with unity than
they were with any political fall-out for doing such a thing.
When they arrived to Hebron, they gave David credit for leading the
people following Saul’s death. And for
the sake of unity, these northern leaders anointed David to be the king for
both the northern as well as the southern tribes.
So, the first hero was this group of leaders who risked everything to
acknowledge David as King.
And the second hero in this story is David himself. David could have continued his rule right
there in the city of Hebron in the southern territory which would have been the
easy thing for him to do. But instead of
alienating the northern territory, he strategically chose a neutral city, a Washington
D.C. type of city to be the new capitol for a unified people, a city that had
neither southern or northern connections.
And that city was Jerusalem.
But there was only one problem.
The city of Jerusalem was controlled by the Jebusites, which were a
people that Israel had never been able to defeat. Defeating the Jebusites and claiming
Jerusalem as the new capitol of all of Israel would be a symbol of this new
unity of Israel. This is one of the reasons
why David was such a great leader. Not
only was he a man after God’s own heart, he also had a heart for the unity of
God’s people.
But David’s brave decision to conquer Jerusalem would not be easy. The Jebusites were a very confident people
and they boasted that the walls of the city were so strong that the city could
even be defended by the blind and the lame.
David’s plan was to not enter by the walls but to out-smart them by
entering through the water shaft which he and his privately paid soldiers ended
up doing and they were successful. And
this is why the city of Jerusalem is also known as the City of David.
David, along with the leaders of the northern territory who put unity
ahead of politics are the heroes of this story from II Samuel. It was because of their heroic actions, that
God’s people became a united people again.
They were now one nation under God.
Some of you might have watched the HBO movie “Game Change” which gives
one perspective on the selection of Sarah Palin for the GOP vice-presidential
slot in the 2008 McCain campaign. Those on the political right seem to be
convinced the movie was too hard on Palin.
Those on the political left are certain it was too easy on her.
While that debate might be the focus for some, I am more interested in a
scene from that movie that I believe connects with our story about David and
the importance of unity. The scene comes
toward the end of the movie which corresponds to real events from early October
in 2008.
In a town hall meeting in Lakeville, Minnesota, presidential candidate
John McCain took the microphone from a supporter who had referenced then
Senator Barak Obama as an Arab. After
taking it, he responded, “No, ma’am. No, ma’am.
He’s a decent family man, a citizen whom I just happen to have serious
differences with on fundamental questions.
Rather than attempting further to exploit divisive and inaccurate
partisan bickering, McCain sought to refocus the discussion. John McCain helped to remind us that the question
was not who was a real American, but it was instead about ideas and policies
and that’s where the discussion belonged.
That scene in the movie was a highlight of what makes our country so
great. Even though we are a nation of
many differences, opinions, and ideological views on the direction our country
should go, we are to remember that we are still one nation under God. We just don’t need to tear each other down to
get there.
Several years ago, I served a church that faced a very difficult
decision. We were trying to discern if
we should consider merging with another United Methodist congregation that was
not that far from us.
Our two churches were about the same size and we thought that if we
would bring our resources together and become one congregation that we would be
more effective in our ministry and outreach.
Leaders from both churches served on a joint task force and after
several meetings, research, and a lot of prayer, the recommendation was to
merge.
So we had a joint congregational meeting to vote in which both churches
were present. Our District
Superintendent presided at this meeting which was held in the sanctuary of the
church I was serving.
After our joint task force made their presentation and their
recommendation for our two churches to merge, we voted. We decided that for the motion to pass, we
should have both congregations vote separately.
Instead of a simple majority, we recommended approval to be 2/3 for each
congregation.
I remember this like it was yesterday.
We distributed the ballots and the people voted with a simple, yes or
no. Since it would take a while to count
the ballots, the District Superintendent led us in a time of singing. I felt God’s presence as our two congregations
sang together. There was a spirit of
unity. The sanctuary was filled. I remember thinking that this was why the
task force was recommending the merger.
This was a taste of what our two congregations could do together as one
united church.
When the counting of the ballots was completed, the District
Superintendent invited the joint task force to face the congregation. He thanked them for all their hard work,
their long hours, and their many prayers.
Everyone applauded. I was so
excited. God was about to do a new thing
among our churches.
Finally, the District Superintendent was ready to announce the results
of the vote. He began with the other
church and said that they voted 78% in approval of the merger, well above the
2/3 required. There was some light
applause but everyone knew that there was still one more church.
Everyone was on the edge of their pew waiting with anticipation. The eyes of the task force members were
turned toward where the District Superintendent was standing. I think I saw a few crossed fingers in the
group. Finally he announced the results
that my church had voted only 54% in favor, short of the needed 2/3 approval.
My heart sank. And I’ll never
forget the look of disappointment on the faces of those faithful task force
members who had given so much of their time, energy, and hard work over the
past several months. These faithful
church members who didn’t know each other very well before our meetings had
started, were now close friends in the Lord.
Tears streamed down their faces as they sought to maintain their composure. After the District Superintendent closed our
time with prayer, the spirit of excitement that had filled the sanctuary just
moments before had all of the sudden evaporated. And many of us were left in heart ache.
That week, I remember feeling so bitter and angry toward my own
congregation since we were the ones who voted it down. I was thinking not so pleasant thoughts. If there was any time that I would become a hell,
fire, and brimstone preacher, that upcoming Sunday would have been it! I remember feeling like I didn’t want to even
be a pastor anymore and I’ve always loved being a pastor. Politics got the best of me, I guess you
could say.
And then this evil thought came to me during that week. As pastor, I have a lot of power. I get to stand up in front of people and say
things. I could shame them and tell them
how we had just missed out on a golden opportunity to be a stronger
church. At the least, I could drop
subtle hints in my sermon to let them know of my displeasure.
But here’s what really
happened. God softened my heart that
week. Slowly, but surely, God allowed me
to be angry, but then reminded me to use my authority as a pastor for
good. In my prayer time that week, God
was telling me that something really good was going to come out of this
disappointment in my ministry.
And so, that Sunday morning during the welcome and announcement time of
worship, I named the elephant in the room and I said how many of us had
participated in the vote earlier that week and that the merger proposal had
been defeated. And I said how easy it
will be to look at each other as a “yes” vote or as a “no” vote. But I said, that’s not who we are. We are one body in our one Lord. We are not a “no” or a “yes” people. We are so much more than that. We are brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ.
Do you know that it was only a couple of months later that things began
to really happen in our church? They let
me put a video screen in the sanctuary.
They voted yes for a new contemporary worship service. It was like they gave me a blank check and
said, “Let’s do whatever it takes to grow
the church right here, pastor.” And
we did. We experienced significant
growth from that point on. But we did it
together, not as a divided body of Christ but as a united body of Christ. God was right. Something good was going to come out of thee
most disappointing time in all of my pastoral ministry.
And this is why David is a great man to follow in these summer
months. He’s my hero. He, along with those leaders from the
northern territory of Israel knew that unity was essential if they were to move
forward as the people of God.
And isn’t it interesting that because of David’s desire for unity among
God’s people, that the last verse from our scripture reading today says, “And David became greater and greater, for
the Lord, the God of hosts, was with him.” When you and I seek unity among
God’s people, great things can happen.
One of my favorite quotes comes from St. Augustine which John Wesley,
the founder of Methodism took to heart in his work and ministry. It goes like this. “In
essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.”
May it be so.
